Oilybits
Chemiphase for biodiesel additives TT700A promotional video.

Not logged in [Login - Register]

Go To Bottom

Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favorites  
Author: Subject: Direct injection and blends?
fred1
Member
***


Avatar


Posts: 114
Registered: 28-3-2008
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 3-12-2009 at 10:31 PM
Direct injection and blends?


Hello again

As far as I know virtually all car manufactures are producing cars which are direct injection.
Can anyone point me towards some research that has successfully used a blend in a direct injection engine?
Has anyone use a blend on a modern indirect engine for a lengthy period of time?
Any problems with it?

Any comments and opinions would be appreciated


Thanks

Fred
View user's profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
CHUNDER
Senior Member
****




Posts: 612
Registered: 7-7-2008
Location: MILTON KEYNES
Member Is Offline

Mood: Bemused

[*] posted on 3-12-2009 at 11:40 PM


fred dont want to apear thick but blend of what bio and diesel or ????




MERC 300TD W124 SINGLE TANK WVO PLUS A BIT OF THIS AND THAT PLUS KIMBO THE JACK RUSELL SORT OF WITH THE MIND OF A ROTWILER ON SPEED
View user's profile View All Posts By User U2U Member This user has MSN Messenger
Bottleveg
Posting Freak
*****




Posts: 2026
Registered: 13-5-2007
Location: Worcestershire
Member Is Offline

Mood: Orgasmic

[*] posted on 4-12-2009 at 01:37 AM


I guess your talking uvo/ diesel? The jury is still out! A lot must depend on engine, time of year and how long you wish to keep the vehicle. Maybe it’s a bit like smoking, there’s always someone who smoked 80 a day and lived till 120.



(Mark) 1998 Ford Escort 1.8TD.2nd Lucas pump. Twin tank. 100% UVO. Now sold.
1997 Astra 1.7TD Isuzu. 100% UVO. Dog rides shotgun. 1999 Merc Sprinter 310 2.9Di Twin tank 100% UVO. Dog needs a lift to get in, and ride shotgun.
WMO central heating. Lister 8/1 SOM to be run on WMO.
View user's profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
knighty
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1370
Registered: 31-1-2009
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 4-12-2009 at 01:41 AM


I've got one of the new transits (but not the brand new ones) it's direct injection and we mix in the tank.... warm it up in the morning on the way into work, then guess how much oil we'll need and put that much in.... run it down as low as we can... then put in just enough diesel to get home with.... works fine :)


also used to do the same thing in the iveco, which is direct injection and common rail ;-)


you need to check for an in tank lift pump etc.. before you start using it.... a lot of these will die pretty quick with veg oil.... the tranist doesen;t have one, and the one on the iveco is a big meaty one so it was ok (on a blend).... had to add an expensive gear pump when I converted it to 2 tanks :o




2001 Iveco Daily 65C15 2.8commom rail - twin tanked - LINK
2004 Transit - mixing uvo in the tank - out just enough oil in, in the morning, fill up with diesel on a night
1999 Citron Relay - single tanked 100% uvo - 5% petrol when it's really cold !
View user's profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
fred1
Member
***


Avatar


Posts: 114
Registered: 28-3-2008
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 4-12-2009 at 04:01 AM


Hi

What type of blend?
Well I use 80% veg 10% petrol 10% diesel, byt thats in a Pug 406 which is indirect
Its just that at some stage I will have to change the car and I was wondering had anyone used a similar blend in a direct injected car? Possibley by increasing the petrol % to "thin" the veg even more, making it more acceptable to a direct injection car
I know its best to twin tank these, and even then there may be problems
Thanks again

fred
View user's profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
knighty
Posting Freak
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1370
Registered: 31-1-2009
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 4-12-2009 at 04:30 AM


well... they'll start up on about 50/50 veg/diesel.... but that was in the summer... and it was a struggle some times :(





2001 Iveco Daily 65C15 2.8commom rail - twin tanked - LINK
2004 Transit - mixing uvo in the tank - out just enough oil in, in the morning, fill up with diesel on a night
1999 Citron Relay - single tanked 100% uvo - 5% petrol when it's really cold !
View user's profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
e3msb
Super Moderator
*******


Avatar


Posts: 8728
Registered: 20-6-2007
Location: Huddersfield.UK
Member Is Offline

Mood: only just coping

[*] posted on 4-12-2009 at 03:36 PM


thats a good way to run a DI on veg/bio, as the engine is hot, but for anyone else watching...cold oil on cold pistons eqauls ring gumming and polymerised sump oil, which equals dead engine....it may take two or three thousand miles, but it will happen. Its really quite easy to fit a twin tank system.



e3msb[steve] 96 disco 300. bio 100. Cit ZX. wvo/mix. PUG405 wvo/mix. Vintage JCB3c GT. bio. home/cent heating,wvo/glyc-oil. Linde forklift 3cyl Deutz WVO. Petter twin diesel 7kva generator, bio and wvo. Dennis fire engine 1971. 5.8 perkins T6354 historic vehicle, bio. IF YOU HAVE GAINED KNOWLEDGE OR BEEN AMUSED BY THE ANSWERS GIVEN PLEASE MAKE A SMALL DONATION TO THE FORUM
View user's profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
fred1
Member
***


Avatar


Posts: 114
Registered: 28-3-2008
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 4-12-2009 at 04:23 PM


Hi again

I know Hans Schur's did considerable research some time ago with petrol and diesel blends. He published a table with his results, can’t find it on the net now.
Anyway as far as I can remember all the engines where indirect.
As indirect cars/engines become less available it looks as if blending will eventually die. This will leave us all to go twin tank.
Now I’m happy to go this route, but I would really like to know scientifically that blending any combination of veg, petrol and diesel will result in a direct engine dying.
When Hans Schur's did his research people thought that an indirect diesel engine would die


Fred
View user's profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
e3msb
Super Moderator
*******


Avatar


Posts: 8728
Registered: 20-6-2007
Location: Huddersfield.UK
Member Is Offline

Mood: only just coping

[*] posted on 4-12-2009 at 07:25 PM


we have had photos in the past showing gummed rings from veg abuse on direct inj engines...they will be in the search archives somewhere. I have seen canal boat engines run on vegoil that ended up nacked cos they didnt realise they were DI. Just cos engines are old people presume that they indirect, but even back in the 20s and 30s they made direct inj engines. I have also seen a totally destroyed transit engine that got sump glump from running on half WVO. Having said that, guys have come on the forum and said they have done a few thousand miles with no problem, but perhaps it was the next owners problem then. If there was no problem then I cant see that firms like elsbett with all their tech skill etc would bother with coplicated twin tank kits if they could have made cheap single tank ones that everyone could afford.



e3msb[steve] 96 disco 300. bio 100. Cit ZX. wvo/mix. PUG405 wvo/mix. Vintage JCB3c GT. bio. home/cent heating,wvo/glyc-oil. Linde forklift 3cyl Deutz WVO. Petter twin diesel 7kva generator, bio and wvo. Dennis fire engine 1971. 5.8 perkins T6354 historic vehicle, bio. IF YOU HAVE GAINED KNOWLEDGE OR BEEN AMUSED BY THE ANSWERS GIVEN PLEASE MAKE A SMALL DONATION TO THE FORUM
View user's profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
fred1
Member
***


Avatar


Posts: 114
Registered: 28-3-2008
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 4-12-2009 at 08:01 PM


Steve

Playing devils advocate here.
It’s not in Elsbett interest to promote single tank blending
What’s needed are some scientific experiments on real road cars, the type we use every day, that are direct injection
Things like using different injectors, mixing with 20% diesel, adding efficient heat exchangers would all help.
Probably a pipe dream, as it would cost a fortune.
As I have said before, are we all destined to drive old cars or have twin tanks?
I know there is the bio diesel option, but I just don’t like mixing “dangerous chemicals”


fred
View user's profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
jhanananda
Member
***




Posts: 391
Registered: 29-6-2008
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 5-12-2009 at 02:26 AM


Fred, there seems to be a lot of concern about running blends on a Direct Injected engine; however, I see no reason why the method would not work, but DI engines might be a bit more touchy than Indirect Injected diesel engines. The trick is to figure it out on an older engine, then tweak it for a newer engine. A 50/50 blend of VO and diesel is not a well honed blend strategy that is likely to work on a DI engine. On the other hand I would think a 70-80% VO to 20-30% Petrol blend would most probably work just fine. Here are some dialogs on the subject that I found on other forums:

VW TDI blenders
http://biodiesel.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/9751014871/m/6421006552
http://biodiesel.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/9751014871/m/2891071942
http://biodiesel.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/9751014871/m/8671023781
http://biodiesel.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/9751014871/m/7981000912
http://biodiesel.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/9751014871/m/8361069612
http://biodiesel.infopop.cc/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/9751014871/m/5741019212
View user's profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
fred1
Member
***


Avatar


Posts: 114
Registered: 28-3-2008
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 5-12-2009 at 04:25 AM


Above links dont seem to work
View user's profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
jhanananda
Member
***




Posts: 391
Registered: 29-6-2008
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 5-12-2009 at 03:43 PM


Gee, if the above links do not work, is it worth considering that the moderators of the BIODIESEL & SVO DISCUSSION FORUMS at infopop might have deleted them? If so, can anyone think why they would do that? Did someone up thread suggest that blending does not receive the same kind of support as other biofuels strategies because none of the moderators of the various biofuels forums make anything off the method? And, is it the same reason why I have been banned from most of the biofuels forums? And, we could even consider it is the same reason why blending does not enjoy its own forum here but is buried under SVO. But, I guess we should not push the limit of the generosity of the moderators here, but it seems like an interesting series of questions we can all ask ourselves without needing an answer. But, if you want unbiased dialog on blending theory you might want to join the only forum where blending biofuels is the theme.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/veggie_fuel_blennders/
View user's profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

  Go To Top

Powered by XMB
Developed By The XMB Group © 2001-2008

Currency data courtesy coinmill.com

Rules for this forum:
1.No swearing or abusive behavior will be tolerated.
2.No spamming by any means - we WILL spot spam.
3.Advertising is allowed in the classified section only, unless you have paid for a banner at the top of the pages.
4.No dangerous equipment can be advertised and all chemical processors must be vetted beforehand.
5.You are free to voice your opinions on any subject. Most of our posts are only opinions and should not be taken as fact.
6.Non of the opinions or posts on this forum, by moderators, administrators, or otherwise, represent the opinions or policies of Goat Industries.
7.To keep this a friendly place, a sense of humor is appreciated.

Health and safety:
1.Biodiesel production is a potentially dangerous process and should only be undertaken by competent people. It is not suitable for unsupervised children etc.
2.Methanol has explosive vapors and is deadly poisonous. It burns with an invisible flame.
3.Sodium hydroxide/potassium hydroxide/caustic/lye will burn skin. Do not breathe in the dust. Animals will try to eat it as it smells of salt.
4.Concentrated sulphuric acid will burn skin and explode if water is added to it.
5.All these chemicals should be stored properly and kept away from children.
6.Most common serious accident: Processor blows up due to immersion heater being accidently switched on when empty.